Burkina Faso after Thomas Sankara – Part 2: Private sector

In 2022, over 3.4 million citizens of Burkina Faso are facing food insecurity and one important reason is the conflicts between different communities supported by corresponding private companies (IFRC 2022). This kind of phenomenon has lasted for many years and led to increasing worry about the current development paradigm of Burkina Faso’s irrigation system: could private sectors truly helps this country to get out of the shadow of famine (e.g. Le Monde 2020)?


Figure 1: displaced family in Dori, Burkina Faso (NRC 2022)


The private sectors, as many other countries, have multiple impacts on the irrigation systems of Burkina Faso. This model has secured the effective use of water resources in many places. On the other hand, the private sector, which mainly supports the communities that plant cash crops, is trying the grab the water which was used for growing subsistence crops for basic food supply even with armed conflicts (Kambou et al. 2019).

 

Some people might argue that with the huge negative impacts that private companies have such as refugees, we should get back the model of Thomas Sankara which is a top-down system with land and water resources under government control as Burkina Faso has sufficient food only in his period  (Peterson 2021). But there are other realistic factors that we should consider: cotton does increase the average income of local communities and contribute valuable revenue to buy food to counter food shortages in the international market, the government-guided crop communities are proven to be inefficient when using water resources (Kambou et al. 2019), and the current government of Burkina Faso itself, does not have strong state capacity (World Bank 2022). In this situation, I would suggest that the Burkina Faso government should act in a more moderate way, which means cooperating with private sector and acting more like a middleman between communities and private sectors and between different communities. For instance, now the government could license the upstream cotton communities first, which are using water resources illegally now, to develop a negotiating mechanism between the upstream and downstream crop communities. By developing this horizontal mechanism across the country (Golooba-Mutebi 2012), although questions like unequal access to water resources would still exist, it would be helpful to restore the current stagnant agricultural production and irrigation caused by continuous inter-communal conflicts. The government could also import private sectors in managing water resources in these crop-based communities to increase water use efficiency (Kambou et al. 2019).

 

From this point, we finished this journey which last for one semester. As we have discussed in all the blogs, the relationship between water and food in Africa is very complicated and food insecurity is a systematic problem. We need comprehensive solutions with the for the two questions with detailed investigation on local situation. 


Figure 2: Land of Africa (Mavuno Technology 2022)


Comments